Re: [legaldocml] activeRef in amendments

From my point of view, you have that right. 

Ciao

Fabio

--

Il giorno 07/mar/2013, alle ore 15.08, Ashok Hariharan ha scritto:

> for an amendment document, i am a bit confused by the <activeRef> and <original> elements in the <references> section -- 
> 
> My understanding is -- 
>  
> <original> has a reference to the amendment (the same as FRBRExpression/FRBRthis of the amendment  document)  ?
> 
> <activeRef > is this a reference to the Act/Bill being amended ? 
> 
> Is this correct ?
> 



--

Fabio Vitali                            Tiger got to hunt, bird got to fly,
Dept. of Computer Science        Man got to sit and wonder "Why, why, why?'
Univ. of Bologna  ITALY               Tiger got to sleep, bird got to land,
phone:  +39 051 2094872              Man got to tell himself he understand.
e-mail:          Kurt Vonnegut (1922-2007), "Cat's cradle"
http://vitali.web.cs.unibo.it/