>Off topic, but let's think about this, and talk
>more at XML 2000.
Off topic again, I will be there too, and happy to meet up with everyone
attending (including Debbie & Mr Moose).
>It is an attempt not to limit ourselves to URLs, on the assumptions
>that URNs (or other) may yet be practical. Since URN provides still
>another level of indirection here, so we need to limit ourselves
>to URLs? (Hope not, but real question.)
On the serious side, I certainly want to see URNs dealt with just as much as
URLs. I think URNs would make good public identifiers, once we get over the
issues of who will be granted namespaces and administer them for the betterment
of the world.
Cheers,
Tony.
========
Anthony B. Coates
Leader of XML Architecture & Design
Chief Technology Office
Reuters Plc, London.
========
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
