+2 Exactly!
Cheers,
Rex
At 11:06 AM -0700 1/23/08, David RR Webber \(XML\) wrote:
>Alessandro,
>
>+1 - perfect!
>
>Thanks, DW
>
><snip>We have a conformance section in this standard. It says, more
>or less, that
>a conforming "HAVE report" is an XML document that validates against the
>HAVE schema and meets the additional requirements in the standard, and a
>conforming "HAVE report producer" is a software entity that produces a
>conforming report when it is expected to do so. (It doesn't matter how such
>an expectation is set and how the report is produced and made available.)
>So I think that a statement of use from an organization should say,
>essentially, that that organization has been able to implement a conforming
>producer. The actual form of the producer doesn't matter.
>
>Alessandro
></snip>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs
>in OASIS at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
--
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-898-0670
