← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

RE: UOM

From
Carl Reed <>
Date
2004-01-06T22:19:56+00:00
ID
012001c3d4a4$c5a425a0$ded6fea9@CarlReed
Thread
RE: UOM
In response to a CAP Issue #19, I would suggest that CAP encode a uom attribute such 
as:

    <app:height uom = 
"#feet">500</app:height>

The message should then include a 
UOM definition for feet within the same data package. This is the approach we 
use in the OGC in GML, CRS definitions, etc. This approach is based on the OGC 
UOM Recommendation Paper (Bobbitt, 2002) which in turn is based on relevant ISO 
documents.

 

Cheers

Carl
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread