At 09:09 PM 10/15/2003 -0700, Rex Brooks wrote:
>[...] On the lat/long issue, I think punting at this point makes more
>sense. Noting that referenced specs should be followed according to the
>current practice pending comment on the candidate Committee Specification
>should be sufficient.
There is no "issue" as the order of latitude and longitude coordinates.
As I pointed out in a note to the Messages SC on September 18, the CAP
specification includes the "WGS-84 Note" which clearly states:
"A WGS-84 coordinate value is here represented as a comma-delimited
latitude/longitude pair,"
Eliot
