Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [emergency-msg] RM or RM?

From
Rex Brooks <>
Date
2006-08-11T12:30:57+00:00
ID
a06230925c102287eac8f@[67.101.151.150]
Thread
Re: [emergency-msg] RM or RM?
Thanks, Renato, Karen,

I noticed that and promptly forgot it. I believe it is supposed to be 
Resource Messaging. It would be a misnomer to term it Management, 
although what we are doing is enabling better management, but we are 
not building a policy or process specification, just messaging.

Cheers,
Rex

At 3:20 PM +1000 8/11/06, Renato Iannella wrote:
>Hi - we've noticed that on the latest EDXL-RM working draft, the 
>title is "Resource Management" rather than "Resource Messaging".
>(Or could it be Resource Element?)
>
>Which one is correct?
>
>
>Cheers... Renato & Karen
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain legally
>privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy,
>use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
>recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both
>messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
>data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
>amendment. This notice should not be removed.


-- 
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-849-2309
Next in thread → Next in month →