Bob Haugen,
Thanks for the clarification.
Paul
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul R. Levine/Telcordia on 01/23/2001 11:26
PM ---------------------------
Bob Haugen <[email protected]> on 01/23/2001 06:26:08 PM
To: "'Paul R. Levine'" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "James D. Clark"
<[email protected]>, "Nieman, Scott" <[email protected]>,
"Johnston, Simon" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> (bcc: Paul R.
Levine/Telcordia)
Subject: RE: 22 Jan. call report and 29 Jan. call notice
Correction on minutes:
>Commenting on the BPE meeting, Karsten said the BPE design will support the
>Specification Schema in all respects except for the Business Operations Map
>(BOM) perspective of the metamodel. Bob said the BOM was primarily a method
>for scoping the business collaboration to be modeled, and didn't need to be
part of the
>BPE.
^^^^^
If I said that, it wasn't what I *meant* to say, which was that the BOM *does*
need to be part of the BPE, but it does *not* need to be part of the
Specification
Schema.
-Bob Haugen
