RE: Collaboration Services (was: Business Service Interface)

From
Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM <>
To
"Welsh, David" <>
Date
2000-10-23T17:56:42Z
ID
<OFF2909074.5293CED6&#45;>
Thread
RE: Collaboration Services (was: Business Service Interface)

Why can't those relationships be expressed in a message?  The message may
say "check my web site for the latest version" but it's still a message
that flows so I don't have to keep checking your web site until something
changes.

Regards,
Marty

*************************************************************************************

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************



"Welsh, David" <[email protected]> on 10/23/2000 01:22:22 PM

To:   "'Nikola Stojanovic'" <[email protected]>,
      "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
      [email protected]
cc:
Subject:  RE: Collaboration Services (was: Business Service Interface)



Good point, however I imagine we could also collaborate in a business
realtionship on a shared building design plan or on the needed color
corrections on a new fashion image or share access to a catalog of new
record sound samples hosted at a 3rd party site. Would you classify those
business relationships as expressed in a "message" ?
Sorry but I'm trying to get away from sending copy's of PO's and invoices
back and forth ....

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Nikola Stojanovic [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 10:06 AM
To: '[email protected]'; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Collaboration Services (was: Business Service Interface)


<David Welsh>
Ok, I can buy some of the suggested terms ...
So ... we can say ebXML is ...


"Collaborating business activities representing (core) business processes
(made from core components) hosted in a Repository and normally qualified
thru standard methods when a trading relationship is negotiated and
maintained."
</David Welsh>

I wouldn't neglect very important -> TR&P aspect of it (ebXML). I don't
have
the right modification yet, but something like:

"Collaborating (via ... Messages) business activities representing (core)
Business Processes
(made from Core Components) hosted in a Repository and normally qualified
thru standard methods when a trading relationship is negotiated and
maintained."

Regards,
Nikola