David,
Let me restate upfront: if RegRep adopts GUIDE,
it will change my attitude immediately.
<<<<<<<<<<
I don't see how you can call it ebXML GUIDE yet.
You are representing this as if it were already
adopted by RegRep,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>You've been pressing me to say this - and
>I've been studiously avoiding it! Right now
>it's in the RegRep discussion document
Why are you avoiding it? It would have saved
a couple of useless messages. Something that is
adopted by another ebXML group is very different
from somebody's good idea from out of the blue
where they insist "if we don;t do this - nothing
works."
>It was never intended to be anything more than
>a simple place holder in lieu of to aid understanding
>of the big picture. It actually even SAYS that in the
>GUIDE spec's - that this will be replaced by what
>BP/CC are working on!
Good. I did not get that impression. That would make
it easier, assuming GUIDE is something we all need to use.
At this point, I will leave it to the project leaders to
decide if we do or not.
-Bob Haugen
