RE: attachment

Karsten,

I very much like what you've put together. It's clear, succinct and easily
understood by the "innocent bystander."

I do have one question, though, and it relates to your use of the term "core
data blocks." Are ebXML "core components", ebXML "smart core components", a
variant of a common busines object, or something else altogether.

It's becoming ever more critical that all of ebXML uses the same term/label
and MEANS the same thing.

Could you clarify this for me?

Thanks,

Rachel

|-----Original Message-----
|From: Karsten Riemer - Sun IR Development
|[mailto:[email protected]]
|Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 4:15 PM
|To: [email protected]; 'Tim McGrath';
|[email protected]; [email protected];
|[email protected]; [email protected];
|[email protected]; [email protected];
|[email protected]; [email protected];
|[email protected]; [email protected]
|Cc: [email protected]
|Subject: attachment
|
|
|again, with attachment, in .ppt
|
|>Hi,
|>I have to speak about ebXML at Sun at an internal XML summit tomorrow.
|>So I put together 5 simple slides, but I think I found a good way to
|>show the overall ebXML architecture on one slide, check it out and
|>let me know what you think, perhaps it could be a unifying slide for
|>our presentations at the bootcamp,
|>
|>oops, I have trouble attaching the file, look for a follow up e-mail
|>
|>-karsten
|>
|
|