RE: Comment

From
<>
To
Bob Haugen <>
Date
2000-07-12T08:11:08Z
ID
<>
Thread
RE: Comment



|In my recent proposal to simplify the BusinessProcessDefinition
|hierarchy, in response to Karsten Riemer's issue #k, any level
|of the hierarchy could have OrderingRules and TransactionConstraints
|that could manage sequences of Transactions.   I think this would
|handle your issue.
|

It seems then that the StepDefinition should be associated to OrderingRule,
in order to provide it at the Step level and also BusinessTransaction.
But it does not seem a StepDefinition should have
BusinessTransactionContraint.
Correct?

Scott Hinkelman
Senior Software Engineer, SWG IBM Austin
512-823-8097 (TL 793-8097) (Cell: 512-940-0519)
[email protected], Fax: 512-838-1074