← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Comments on the BPM Meta-model

From
LONJON Antoine <>
To
"''" <>
Date
2000-07-10T20:17:42Z
ID
<>
Thread
Comments on the BPM Meta-model
As Karsten proposed, I think there should be an association between
BusinessService and BusinessServiceInterface. But, it this case, the
assocation between Party and BusinessInterface should disapper.

- As stated in the BPM document comments, Business Interface should be
associated to Partner Role and not to Transaction. Indeed a business service
interface is the implementation of one side of Transaction, hence the
implementation of a Partner role.

- In such a case, Partner Role would better be a composite of Transaction
(Composite association) otherwise we wouldn�t know which Transaction the
Business Service Interface would be the implementation of.



Antoine LONJON
MEGA International
33.1.42.75.40.30
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

 


← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →