Addendum to BP metamodel suggestions:
I know that some people are not aware that the first
cut of the ebXML BP metamodel will not actually be
in XML (or so I understand, anyway).
Here is my current understanding, stated explicitly:
The first version of the ebXML BP metamodel will be
represented in a combination of UML and text.
XML will come later, derived in some way from the UML.
Questions:
1. Is that correct?
2. Will the UML follow the UN/CEFACT N090 Methodology,
as the Registry group is doing?
Respectfully,
Bob Haugen
