← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Public Comment

From
<>
Date
2005-08-18T07:22:33+00:00
ID
Thread
Public Comment
Comment from: 

Name: Simon Sprott
Title: Technical Director
Organization: Liquid Technologies
Regarding Specification: ebbp-signals-2.0.1.xsd

We have been testing your new schemas for compliance with our XML Data Binding tool Liquid XML 2005. However the schema ebbp-signals-2.0.1.xsd, is invalid - it contains an unknown element ProcessSpecificationReferenceType.

With this removed both the signal and ebbp-2.0.1.xsd schemas can have classes generated from the correctly, however your sample XML files are also invalid - 
ebxmlbp-2.0.1-cd-ExamplePIP7c7For1.01-en.xml
ebxmlbp-2.0.1-cd-ExampleTransformFor1.01-en.xml
each containing a number of problems, that prevent them from validating against the schema.

If you fix these problems, we would be happy to re-test your schemas, and validate the generated class libraries against any sample xml documents you may have. 

We also believe that our tool Liquid XML, would be of use to many of your members, especially anyone manipulating XML fro C++, .Net, Java or COM. Once these small issues have been resolved, and we have successfully re-tested your schemas/samples would it be possible to send a information about the product out with the next release note?

http://www.liquid-technologies.com

Regards Simon Sprott

Reference:

<xsd:complexType name="SignalIdentificationInformation">
	...
	<xsd:sequence>
		...
		<xsd:element name="ProcessSpecificationInfo" type="bpssignal:ProcessSpecificationReferenceType" minOccurs="0"/>
		...
	</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread