>> <dale> and the ebXML JC serves as a forum for how this coordination
>> and alignment can occur.</dale>
>
> mackenzie: I think that the JC is another issue that needs to be
> somehow addressed. I have observed its operation for a few months
> now, and it does not seem to serve a really useful purpose as configured.
>
> Can somebody explain to me what it is supposed to be doing for us, and
> why what it does cannot just be done informally or in a more inclusive
> manner?
mm1: Matt, reviewing minutes may only partially indicate any ongoing
work or progress. To your question re: the JC, it has made progress
(albeit slowly). For example, ebMS-CPPA-ebBP have been using that forum
to aid in aligning new specification versions, and encourage comment
from other JC members. This helps provide the capability to continue to
evolve the architecture of the set of ebXML components (even if
loosely). As you have resigned as ebSOA editor, who will ebSOA consider
to propose as a JC member, or is a question for John (Hardin)? Thank you.
