RE: [ebsoa] [Fwd: Crashes Deserve a Closer Look]

Yes, and let's not forget the run-time aspects, beyond the tools:

<Quote>
In the realm of software, the move to a service-based architecture
offers developers a more granular opportunity to vote for their own
preferred trade-off between doing more and failing less. Improved tools
are emerging for developers.
</Quote>

For run-time assurance beyond this, we need standards such as the
soon-to-be-released-for-OASIS-review-and-vote Web Services Reliable
Messaging (WSRM).

Kind Regards,
Joe

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David RR Webber [mailto:] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 8:26 AM
> To: ebSOA OASIS TC
> Subject: [ebsoa] [Fwd: Crashes Deserve a Closer Look]
> 
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1651826,00.asp
> 
> I like Peter Coffees' points here.  Clearly having reliable 
> infrastructure is critical.
> 
> This need is more clearly serviced in CPA / BPSS rather than 
> WSDL - with the time-to-perform metrics.
> 
> DW
>