Duane Nickull wrote:
>
> +1 - I believe that having Business Use Patterns is important in order
> to map those to the SOA patterns. That is the differentiator that our
> architecture is specific to those business patterns.
>
> The problem will be deciding what level of granularity to go into each
> business pattern or how many we do. Perhaps we embrace a methodology
> for allowing people to define their own patterns. It would be arrogant
> of us to think that we, as a group, could define all the patterns that
> would ever be used by business on a global scale IMO.
>
> The best course of action will be to probably black box the methodology
> for now, just say there is one, that allow people to capture the
> business lexicon in a series of artifacts, some of which should be BUP??
+1
Joe
> I know that BCM, UMM, RUP and other methodologies have driven at this
> for years.
>
> Comments?
>
> Two reminder as chair:
>
> First - let's make sure we don;t cc people who we know are on the list.
> We only needone copy each.
>
> Second - we should try to keep the thread titles specific to the
> content. I changed this one to SOA BUP.
>
> Thanks
>
> /d
>
> --
> Senior Standards Strategist
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://www.adobe.com
--
Kind Regards,
Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
