Thomas Schraitle <> writes:
>> You can use class attribute to be more specific about value inside
>> systemitem. If there is nothing suitable for you in this list, you can
>> still use rola attribute and invent your own types, e.g.
>>
>> <systemitem role="interface">eth0</systemitem>
>
> An alternative notation would be:
>
> <systemitem class="other" otherclass="interface">eth0</systemitem>
I think that would be “better”, but I also think
> What about adding "interface" to the available values of the class
> attribute for future DocBook versions?
Is a perfectly reasonable idea.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <> | The formula 'Two and two make five' is
http://nwalsh.com/ | not without its attractions.--Dostoevsky
