← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Fwd: Simplified DocBook RelaxNG schema not valid?

From
Frank Arensmeier <>
Date
2014-09-18T10:46:17+00:00
ID
Thread
Fwd: Simplified DocBook RelaxNG schema not valid?
Hello!

I wrote previously to the docbook-apps list and realised that this list might be more appropriate.

Please find my question below.

Thank you!

/frank

Vidarebefordrat brev:

Från: Frank Arensmeier <>

Ämne: Simplified DocBook RelaxNG schema not valid?

Datum: 18 september 2014 09:14:40 CEST

Till: DocBook Apps <>

Hi there!

For a project I am working on, I did a couple of tests with the Simplified DocBook schema. The definition I downloaded was 5.1CR3. When I open that schema in Oxygen I see a couple of validation errors:

System ID: /Users/brillo/Downloads/sdocbook.rng
Description: multiple definitions of start without "combine" attribute
Start location: 290:11

System ID: /Users/brillo/Downloads/sdocbook.rng
Description: multiple definitions of start without "combine" attribute
Start location: 2390:11

System ID: /Users/brillo/Downloads/sdocbook.rng
Description: multiple definitions of start without "combine" attribute
Start location: 6644:11

System ID: /Users/brillo/Downloads/sdocbook.rng
Description: multiple definitions of "db.admonition.blocks" without "combine" attribute
Start location: 6736:40

System ID: /Users/brillo/Downloads/sdocbook.rng
Description: multiple definitions of "db.os.inlines" without "combine" attribute
Start location: 6826:33

System ID: /Users/brillo/Downloads/sdocbook.rng
Description: multiple definitions of "db.programming.inlines" without "combine" attribute
Start location: 6835:42

System ID: /Users/brillo/Downloads/sdocbook.rng
Description: multiple definitions of "db.markup.inlines" without "combine" attribute
Start location: 6853:37

Most of these errors seem to be caused by the fact that there are some duplicates of element definitions. Removing those duplicates however does not make Oxygen happy. Instead, it says: found element matching the prohibited path start//empty in the simplified XML form of the schema[…].

What is going on here? Can this be fixed? Shall I file a bug report somewhere? Do pigs fly?
Thanks!

/frank

Frank Arensmeier


Frank Arensmeier

← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →