On 12/13/2011 11:24 PM, Norman Walsh wrote:
> Joshua Wulf <> writes:
>> I opened an RFE for RDFa support in Docbook 5 [1].
>
> FYI: http://norman.walsh.name/2009/09/22/RDFaForDocBook
>
> Be seeing you,
> norm
>
My comment is at the bottom of that article. :-)
The other one that was very interesting to me was the one where you
modelled the Docbook Publishing model using RDF [1].
There are implications for encoding the meaning of a book using that. If
one "section" for example, corresponds to one real-world component, then
RDF can be used to wire the pieces of the book up in the same way that
the real-world components are "wired up". Transformations or views of
the real-world components that make sense would also "make sense" as
transformations or views of the book content, and vice versa...
A JMS queue topic/section would not just "refer to/see also" the JMS
message topic/section, it could "produce/consume" it.
[1] http://nwalsh.com/docbook/procdiagram/
