RE: [docbook] Website5: Project Codename

Keith's note and this thread are causing me to lean more strongly
towards using the standard repository.

But, if you do end up with a separate repository, please make sure that
it is open for reading by anyone, so we have the same level of access as
we currently have to the DocBook repository.

Dick
---------------------------------
XML Press
XML for Technical Communicators
http://xmlpress.net
(970) 231-3624 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Fahlgren [mailto:] 
> Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 2:05 PM
> To: Richard Hamilton
> Cc: Sina Khakbaz Heshmati; ; 
> docbook-developers
> Subject: Re: [docbook] Website5: Project Codename
> 
> 
> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Richard Hamilton 
> <> wrote:
> > Eventually, the code will need to be merged into the 
> docbook repository,
> > and possibly also dropped into a Google repository.
> >
> > That said, I don't see any problem using another repository for
> > development. Does anyone see a problem with that?
> 
> I would prefer that DocBook-XSL code continued to be consolidated in
> the SVN repository at
> https://docbook.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/docbook (feel free to use
> a branch). That said, if there are compelling reasons for hosting it
> elsewhere *OR* if the project would work better as a standalone entity
> that interoperated well with DocBook-XSL (and there are a lot of
> downsides to integrating into a project as huge as DocBook-XSL), go
> for it.
> 
> 
> Keith
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
>