On 04/09/09 17:28, Dick Hamilton wrote:
> Dave,
>
> role is a valid attribute on literal and is a common
> attribute.
> Since role is user-defined, creating separate names for
> each element lets customizers define the contents of
> role independently for different elements.
>
> So, it's a common attribute by virtue of being common,
> but is defined separate from db.common.attributes so
> that it can be customized.
So it is a tdg omission then?
Thanks Dick, I'll look for it in the new edition!
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
