Re: [docbook] Bibliographies

You might consider using something like this for keywords:

<biblioset role="keywords">
  <bibliocoverage>one key word</bibliocoverage>
  <bibliocoverage>another key word</bibliocoverage>
</biblioset>

That might be a misuse of bibliocoverage, so perhaps bibliomisc would be
better for each key word. Being contained in a biblioset with a role
provides a context to assign semantics and allow the stylesheet to handle
them.

For classification numbers, perhaps biblioid with a role would be
appropriate.

Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
DocBook Consulting



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Mundie" <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 7:52 PM
Subject: [docbook] Bibliographies


> I'm relatively new to Docbook, and would appreciate someone's
> confirming a conclusion I have come to. For my application, I need to
> have keywords and classification numbers in my bibliographic entries.
> The conclusion I've come to is that the only way to do that in
> Docbook is by means of bibliomisc elements, since keywordsets and
> subjectsets are (for some reason) not allowed in biblioentries. Is
> there a better strategy I've overlooked?
>
>   - dam
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
>
>
>