Jeff Biss wrote:
> >><!ENTITY % local.list.class "">
>
> I should have been a bit more clear on what I was really asking, which
> is where are these defined?
Where are *what* defined?
<!ENTITY % local.list.class ""> *is* a definition. It is establishing that
there is an entity named "local.list.class", consisting of an empty string.
The % indicates that it is a "parameter entity", which means (in XML 1.0 [1])
that it is available for use only within a DTD. In places within the DTD where
the XML parser encounters the reference "%local.list.class;", it will
substitute the empty string.
There's nothing in XML about "local.list.class" because this is just a name
that the DTD author invented for this particular parameter entity. It could
just as easily be "foo" and the references to it would be written as "%foo;".
That is, there's no such thing as classes in an XML DTD; what you're seeing is
a pseudo-class, established by a naming convention on a text inclusion
facility that's much, much more general in purpose.
I'm not sure if this really answers your question...
Mike
--
Mike J. Brown | http://skew.org/~mike/resume/
Denver, CO, USA | http://skew.org/xml/
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml
