Thanks Bob and David,
What's the right way to pass the "scale-down-to-fit" attribute value into the FO?
I've tried adding them as attributes on <imagedata> with some XSL that I was using before to handle wide images. Here's the template where xmlns:db="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" exclude-result-prefixes="db":
<xsl:template match="db:imagedata">
<xsl:element name="imagedata" namespace="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook">
<xsl:apply-templates select="node()|@*"/>
<xsl:attribute name="contentdepth">scale-down-to-fit</xsl:attribute>
<xsl:attribute name="contentwidth">scale-down-to-fit</xsl:attribute>
<xsl:attribute name="align">center</xsl:attribute>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:template>
After this transformation and running the stylesheets, text-align="center" shows up in the resulting .fo, but the others are null: content-width="" content-height="".
Is there a stylesheet customization I should apply to allow those attribute values to pass through to the FO?
Or do I need to edit the FO after it gets generated?
Regards,
Mark
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 6:30 PM, David Cramer <> wrote:
What about setting content-width and content-height in the fo to
scale-down-to-fit? Should be supported in fop and xep; not sure about
antenna house:
http://apache-fop.1065347.n5.nabble.com/scale-image-if-too-large-td14003.html#a14005
Regards,
David
On 01/03/2014 04:35 PM, Bob Stayton wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> I'm not sure you can do that with XSL-FO. It works for width because an
> image is not competing with other content for width space. So defining
> width="100%" means the dedicated viewport is 100% of the width of the
> page between margins, and the image is located within that viewport,
> sized down to fit if necessary.
>
> If you set depth="100%", you are creating a viewport that is the height
> of the remaining space on the page, not the whole page. So the height
> of that viewport depends on what precedes the image on the page.
