* Yann Dirson:
> There is even a use-case for this. If the individual XML files do not
> validate (ie. conform to a DTD which has the xinclude elements), then
> we cannot make use of the existing SGML editing tools (psgml comes to
> my mind as one of the most widely used, since its existence even
> brought some vi adepts to launch emacs sometimes).
In my case, SGML is the reason why I don't use XInclude. I would love
to use it, but it would require creating an intermediate XML document
used as new master document for validating and transforming. I avoid to
do that because then the document you have in your editor (ViM) is not
the same as the one for which errors are reported.
Anyway, interesting to hear your point of view.
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
