On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 06:09:37AM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> So I've written a tool that throws away that whole level of structure and
> gets the job done. I'd sure like to develop a better solution, but you
> seem to be intent on denying there is a problem.
I don't affirm or deny anything w.r.t. conditionalization needs. I'm
just stating my position as the guys who implement and maintain the
friggin' code, okay !
I'm not convinced that one need acces to the DocType to conditionalize
*processing* . And I'm definitely convinced that it's useless to try to
add support for an unstructured processing within an XML toolkit.
I don't want to add an add-hoc unspecified unstructured processing
to my toolkit and maintain it. Show me a more coherent request and
I will re-evaluate it. Mind you I have work to get done too !
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
| libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
