Final status of review S: "Appendixes"

The following people participated in the review: TC voting members + volunteers Participation in review S Dawn Stevens X Kris Eberlein X Stan Doherty Nancy Harrison Eric Sirois X Robert Anderson Gershon Joseph Carsten Brennecke Eliot Kimber X Scott Hudson X Zoe Lawson Bill Burns X Frank Wegmann The following comments were marked as “ACCEPTED”: Topic Work to be done Disposition Page in (commented)

PDF E “Element-by-element recommendations for translators” Definition of subflow Accepted 9 The following comments were marked as “REFERRED” : Topic Work to be done Disposition Page or pages in (commented)

PDF A.1 “File naming conventions Conventions for names of document-type shells Referred 4 - 5 E “Element-by-element recommendations for translators” Why do we have a specialization base column?
Is it needed?
Referred 9 - 10 Block/inline (presentation) column: Why do we have this?
What is its purpose?
What values should be permitted?
Eliot suggests block inline metadata subflow.
Referred 10 - 11 List the few attributes that might need translation in a separate section Referred 12 Values for “Translatable content?” column – Eliot suggests adding container.
Referred 13 Block/inline (translation) column – <image>

--
What does it mean for an element to be a block?
Can an image be a block or is just a container (as Eliot suggests)?
Referred 16-17 Map elements: Values for “Block/inline (presentation) – Eliot suggests that all should be n/a, since fundamentally metadata.
Referred 20 - 21 The two relevant PDF files are attached.
Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Owner, Eberlein Consulting LLC 
Skype: kriseberlein; voice: +1 (919) 622-1501 Attachment: review-s-comments.pdf Description: review-s-comments.pdf Attachment: review-s-edited.pdf Description: review-s-edited.pdf