Meeting cancelled for today

I have a family emergency.

Kris

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 20, 2017, at 5:29 PM, Margaret Boos <> wrote:

I uploaded files with changes I made to match Excel files.  My files have MB in file name and I kept the original so you can review the differences.  The zip
 file is called faultDiagnostics-kje-revision-2(mb changes).zip.

 

Some changes were to change xref to confref and use the <calibrationLabelValue> and <calibrationLabelUnit> elements.

 

Some had items in MalfunctionGroup that belonged in the MalfunctionGroup previous. 

 

I also aligned symbols with values.  Some symbols (e.g. =, >=, etc.) had <p> around them so they did not align with the associated value as they do in the Excel
 file.

 

I did not comment the files.  We can review together if you want.  I think if you look in author view between the two files, you will see the differences.

 

From: Kristen James Eberlein [mailto:]

Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 11:55 AM

To: Margaret Boos

Subject: Revised faultDiagnostic topics

 

Uploaded to Box in the DITA Samples folder:

faultDiagnostics-kje-revision-2.zip

I reworked the following topics in the faultDiagnostics.ditamap:

faultDiagnostics_CCVCD_PRESS_PLAUS_KO_TEST.dita

faultDiagnostics_CRANK.dita

faultDiagnostics_Pedal_1_DC_RNG_HI_test.dita

Here are the changes that I made:

Made tables match the Excel files

In the <malfunctionGroup> and <secondaryParameterGroup>, changed <xref> in the Threshold value and Enable condition cells to conrefs to <calibrationLabelValue> and <calibrationLabelUnit.

In order to make the reworked topics valid, I also updated the DTD plug-in, which I'll mail out shortly.

-- 

Best,

Kris

Kristen James Eberlein

Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee

Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting

www.eberleinconsulting.com

+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)