Fwd: RE: DITA 2.0: How might we reorganize (reformulate?) the spec for DITA 2.0

From
Kristen James Eberlein <>
Date
2016-09-18T12:19:09+00:00
ID
Thread
Fwd: RE: DITA 2.0: How might we reorganize (reformulate?) the spec for DITA 2.0
This is a micro request, but I'd like to see an alphabetical list/TOC for the attributes, just like what there is now for the elements (Language reference>Element quick reference>All DITA elements, A to Z). Finding a specific attribute description is a little harder than it needs to be, IMO.

Leigh

-----Original Message-----
From: Kristen James Eberlein [mailto:] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 9:52 AM
To: DITA TC <>
Subject: DITA 2.0: How might we reorganize (reformulate?) the spec for DITA 2.0

DITA 1.0: Separate architectural spec and language reference

DITA 1.1: " "

DITA 1.2: Aggregated archSpec and LangRef

DITA 1.3: " " and three editions

What do we want to consider for DITA 2.0?


--
Best,
Kris

Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)