Yes to all save noting that there is a soft return after the "/" so that Public Review Draft 01 is on a second line.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Kristen James Eberlein <> wrote:
OK, so you need two packages: csd01 and csprd01
Identical content, different titles and metadata and links
The TC needs to approve both.
The title on the cover page for csprd01 shoult literally be
"Committee Specification Draft 01 / Public Review Draft 01 ".
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)
On 6/25/2015 10:52 AM, Chet Ensign
wrote:
Hi Kris,
The stage should be done as:
Committee Specification Draft 01 /
Public Review Draft 01
The Previous version link should be left as N/A. For
Previous version links, we use the most recent version with
differences - e.g. CSPRD01 when this is CSPRD02. But since the
content of CSD01 and CSPRD01 are identical, they both use N/A
for Previous version.
/chet
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM,
Kristen James Eberlein <>
wrote:
For the title on the
cover pages and the citation format, which of the
following should it be?
Committee Specification Public Review Draft 01
Public Review Draft 01
On the cover pages, what should be listed in the
"Previous version" section?
Not applicable
Links for csd01, for example, http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/csd01/dita-v1.3-csd01-part0-overview.html
As always, thanks for your help and speedy feedback.
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein
(skype)
On 6/24/2015 11:45 AM, Chet Ensign wrote:
Just a few things - very close...
A number of the links (e.g. This version) are
italicized. Make them plain.
Latest version links are http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/dita-v1.3-csd01-part0-overview.xxx.
The csd01 needs to be removed so that the links
are http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/dita-v1.3-part0-overview.xxx.
That also has to change in the citation block.
The TC link needs to be to https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/dita/
The '2005' should be removed from the copyright
statement in the footnote
In PDF, the footer should appear on the first
page
In Part 1, the footer still has WD- at the
start of the filename
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:43
AM, Kristen James Eberlein <>
wrote:
Please
ignore my earlier e-mail, and look at the PDF
files in the attached ZIP.
Have I incorporated your feedback correctly?
Many thanks.
--
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1
919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)
--
/chet
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards Development and TC
Administration
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the
information society
http://www.oasis-open.org
Primary: +1
973-996-2298
Mobile: +1
201-341-1393
--
/chet
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards Development and TC Administration
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information
society
http://www.oasis-open.org
Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393
--
/chet
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards Development and TC Administration
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org
Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393
