Re: Questions about csprd01

From
Chet Ensign <>
Date
2015-06-25T14:52:55+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: Questions about csprd01
Hi Kris, 

The stage should be done as: 

Committee Specification Draft 01 /

Public Review Draft 01 

The Previous version link should be left as N/A. For Previous version links, we use the most recent version with differences - e.g. CSPRD01 when this is CSPRD02. But since the content of CSD01 and CSPRD01 are identical, they both use N/A for Previous version. 

/chet

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Kristen James Eberlein <> wrote:

  
    
  
  

    For the title on the cover pages and the citation format, which of
    the following should it be?

    
      
Committee Specification Public Review Draft 01

      
 Public Review Draft 01

    
    
On the cover pages, what should be listed in the "Previous
      version" section?

    

    
      
Not applicable

      
Links for csd01, for example,
        http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/csd01/dita-v1.3-csd01-part0-overview.html
        

      

    
    

    
As always, thanks for your help and speedy feedback.

    

    
Best,

      Kris

      

      Kristen James Eberlein

      Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee

      Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting

      www.eberleinconsulting.com

      +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)

      

    

    
On 6/24/2015 11:45 AM, Chet Ensign
      wrote:

    

    
      
Just a few things - very close... 
        

        

        

          
A number of the links (e.g. This version) are italicized.
            Make them plain. 

          

          

          
Latest version links are http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/dita-v1.3-csd01-part0-overview.xxx.
            The csd01 needs to be removed so that the links are http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/dita-v1.3-part0-overview.xxx.
            That also has to change in the citation block. 

          

          

          
The TC link needs to be to https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/dita/

          

          

          
The '2005' should be removed from the copyright statement
            in the footnote 

          

          

          
In PDF, the footer should appear on the first page 

          

          

          
In Part 1, the footer still has WD- at the start of the
            filename 

        

      

      

        
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:43 AM,
          Kristen James Eberlein <>
          wrote:

          Please
            ignore my earlier e-mail, and look at the PDF files in the
            attached ZIP.

            

            Have I incorporated your feedback correctly?

            

            Many thanks.

                

                -- 

                Best,

                Kris

                

                Kristen James Eberlein

                Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee

                Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting

                www.eberleinconsulting.com

                +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein
                (skype)

                

              
        

        

        
        

        

        -- 

        

          

            

              

                /chet 

                ----------------

                Chet Ensign

                Director of Standards Development and TC Administration 

                OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information
                society

                http://www.oasis-open.org

                

                Primary: +1 973-996-2298

                Mobile: +1 201-341-1393 

            

          

        

      

    
    

  

-- 

/chet 
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards Development and TC Administration 
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org

Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393