I would suggest putting machineIndustry in the All-Inclusive edition, since it is for a specific set of users and not likely used by a majority. Otherwise, I’m OK with the editions as listed.
Thanks and best regards,
Scott Hudson
Senior Consultant
Comtech Services Inc.
303-232-7586
From: <> on behalf of Tom Magliery
Date: Monday, June 15, 2015 at 7:51 PM
To: ""
Subject: [dita] Which stuff goes in what edition?
I think we are moving towards agreement with Chet at OASIS about how we can deliver three different DITA editions -- Base, Technical Content, and All-Inclusive. On the assumption that that will succeed, I've been working on diagrams for
the main landing page and the three sub-landing pages, meant to convey (in the former case) the big picture and (in the latter) the big picture plus a sense of "you are here", i.e. what's in the specific edition you're currently looking at.
In one such diagram I (naively) split up the editions like this (via listing the subfolder names from the "doctypes" directory):
Base: base
Technical Content: base, bookmap, machineryIndustry, subjectScheme, technicalContent
All-Inclusive: all that plus learning
Kris noted that in DITA 1.2, subjectScheme was considered part of Base, but suggested that my rearrangement might be a better idea. But this is a question for the TC:
Which stuff goes into which edition?
For purpose of discussion I suggest the above.
mag
