Hi,
My understanding is that it applies to a use case such as when a company has made acquisitions and the new division/subsidiary/etc has been using a different term to define a concept that the acquiring company already has a specified term for. I vaguely remember Rational and then IBM having this situation.
Nancy
_____________
Nancy Harrison
Infobridge Solutions
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Kristen James Eberlein <> wrote:
I was asked about the content model for definition lists this past week.
Why does the content model for <dlentry> allow multiple instances of <dt>? I can understand multiple instances of <dd> -- a term often has multiple definitions -- but a use case for multiple (primary) terms eludes me.
FWIW, the content model for <dlhd> only permits zero or one <dthead> and zero or one <ddhd>.
--
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
