Re: [dita] Suffix for constraint entities

The spec is definitely inconsistent, which must be my fault--I'm surprised I
didn't notice this since I wrote a tutorial on how to create a constraint
module and integrate it and made a point of working from the spec. Hmph.

I think the examples are correct (suffix should be "-c-def") so the
correction should be:

Under "Content constraint module inclusions":

- Change "plus the -c-mod suffix" to "plus the -c-def suffix".

As far as I can tell this is the only place that "-c-mod" is mentioned in
the spec.

Cheers,

Eliot

On 12/1/10 5:47 PM, "Su-Laine Yeo" <> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> I think I've found a couple more issues for the errata. Hope I'm not
> spoiling any parties today.
> 
> In CD04, the topic "2.1.4.2.1 DTD document-type shell: Coding
> requirements" says, "The entity name for the constraint declaration
> consists of the constraint module name plus the -c-mod suffix." The
> example that follows uses -c-def as the suffix, not -c-mod. The Strict
> Task module in the DTDs also uses a -c-def suffix.
> 
> Also, the examples on applying multiple constraints to a single
> vocabulary module in "2.1.4.4.4 Examples of constraint declaration
> modules" is missing a semicolon after the word %title.
> 
> Cheers,
> Su-Laine
> 
> 
> Su-Laine Yeo
> Solutions Consultant
> JustSystems Canada, Inc.
> Office: 1 (778) 327-6356
> 
> 
> XMetaL Community Forums: http://forums.xmetal.com
> For partners only: http://www.justpartnercenter.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> 

-- 
Eliot Kimber
Senior Solutions Architect
"Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together"
Main: 512.554.9368
www.reallysi.com
www.rsuitecms.com