← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

FW: [dita-users] Contradiction in DITA spec for <msgblock> and <msgph> ?

From
Kristen Eberlein <>
Date
2010-12-29T21:46:37+00:00
ID
Thread
FW: [dita-users] Contradiction in DITA spec for <msgblock> and <msgph> ?
An item for us to consider …

Best regards,

Kris

Kristen James Eberlein l DITA Architect and Technical Specialist l SDL Structured Content Technologies Division l (t) + 1 (919) 682-2290 l 

 

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

 

 

 

From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of Steve
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 4:32 PM
To: 
Subject: [dita-users] Contradiction in DITA spec for <msgblock> and <msgph> ?

 

  

Hi, all...

Can anyone please clarify the meanings and usages of the <msgblock> and <msgph> elements? Maybe some examples?

The descriptions of the <msgblock> element in the DITA 1.1 and 1.2 specs imply that a <msgph> can be a child of <msgblock>, but that does not appear to be the case. The description of <msgph> does not include the <msgblock> in its CONTAINED BY section. This seems to be a contradiction.

The confusing description for <msgblock> from the spec is:

"The message block (<msgblock>) element contains a multi-line message or set of messages. The message block can contain multiple message numbers and message descriptions, each enclosed in a <msgnum> and <msgph> element."

Thanks

Steve

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic 

Messages in this topic (1) 

Recent Activity: 

·         New Members 5 

Visit Your Group 

MARKETPLACE

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

Find useful articles and helpful tips on living with Fibromyalgia. Visit the Fibromyalgia Zone today!

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →