Hi Kristen,
Yes, that's fine since you have the separate change log; while the blank page isn't perfect, it doesn't harm or detract in any way.
Regards,
Mary
On Sep 29, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Kristen Eberlein wrote:Hi, Kim.1. Since the “Revision history” was indicated as optional in the OASIS template, we decided to omit it from our committee drafts. Therefore we do not want to reintroduce it at this point.2. I can delete page 1237 from the PDF output. However, all the pages will continue to be marked with “Page x of 1237.” I think retaining the blank page is better.Thoughts? I very much appreciate your help with this matter.Best regards,KrisKristen James Eberlein l DITA Architect and Technical Specialist l SDL Structured Content Technologies Division l (t) + 1 (919) 682-2290 l <image001.jpg>Please consider the environment before printing this e-mailFrom: Kim Goolsby [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:42 PM
To:
Cc: mary.mcrae
Subject: [dita] Changes required to submitted document - Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) Version 1.2TCADMIN-243Please make the following change:1. Please add a 'Revision History' appendix to this document.2. Looking at the pdf, there is an empty page 1237 at the end of the document. I suggest removing this.Thank you,Kim
--
Kim Goolsby
Publications Specialist
OASIS Open: Advancing open standards for the information society
email:
web: www.oasis-open.org
phone: 1.734.223.6890
