Feature #12055 and other references to map-to-map cascading

FYI.

-------- Original Message --------

  
    

      Subject: 
      Re: cascading in the DITA 1.2 spec
    

    

      Date: 
      Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:58:51 -0500
    

    

      From: 
      Kristen James Eberlein <>
    

    

      To: 
      Ogden, Jeff <>
    

    

      CC: 
      Helfinstine, David <>, Grosso, Paul
<>, Robert D Anderson <>
    

    

      References: 
      <>
<>
<>
<>
<>
<>
<>
    

  

Here are documents that pertain to this
issue; I seriously hope that I can get by with simply reading the
feature proposal and that I won't need to read all of the list
discussion.

TC minutes, 9 October 2009

Lists that feature 12055 at 
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/24910/IssueNumber12055.html
was "Accepted by acclamation."

Feature 12055 proposal: 

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/24910/IssueNumber12055.html

E-mail about feature 12055

  
Re:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

    From Robert D Anderson <>
on 5
Sep 2007 21:28:11 -0000
    
      
Re:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

        From Robert D Anderson <>
on
10 Sep 2007 13:29:00 -0000
        
          
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

            From "Grosso, Paul" <>
on 10
Sep 2007 15:27:10 -0000
            
              
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

                From Michael Priestley
                <> on
10 Sep 2007 16:06:51 -0000 

              
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

                From "Ogden, Jeff" <>
on
10 Sep 2007 19:06:00 -0000 

              
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

                From Michael Priestley
                <> on
10 Sep 2007 19:17:47 -0000 

              
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

                From "Ogden, Jeff" <>
on
10 Sep 2007 19:57:15 -0000 

              
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

                From Robert D Anderson
                <> on
10 Sep 2007 22:02:46 -0000 

              
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

                From Michael Priestley
                <> on
11 Sep 2007 14:36:14 -0000 

              
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

                From "Ogden, Jeff" <>
on
11 Sep 2007 16:58:54 -0000 

              
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

                From Michael Priestley
                <> on
11 Sep 2007 17:29:21 -0000 

              
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

                From "Ogden, Jeff" <>
on
11 Sep 2007 18:56:15 -0000 

              
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

                From Michael Priestley
                <> on
11 Sep 2007 19:02:52 -0000 

              
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

                From "Ogden, Jeff" <>
on
11 Sep 2007 22:34:14 -0000 

              
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

                From Michael Priestley
                <> on
11 Sep 2007 23:44:30 -0000 

              
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

                From Erik Hennum <>
on
12 Sep 2007 14:59:04 -0000 

              
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

                From "Ogden, Jeff" <>
on
12 Sep 2007 17:50:33 -0000 

              
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

                From Michael Priestley
                <> on
12 Sep 2007 19:04:52 -0000 

            
          

          
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

            From "Ogden, Jeff" <>
on 10
Sep 2007 18:52:26 -0000 

        
      

      
RE:
[dita] Issue 12055 Map referencing behaviors 

        From "Ogden, Jeff" <>
on 28 Sep
2007 21:53:53 -0000 

    
  

Best,

Kris

Kristen James Eberlein 

Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting 

Secretary, OASIS DITA Technical Committee 

Charter member, OASIS DITA Adoption Committee 

www.eberleinconsulting.com

+1
919
682-2290; keberlein (skype)

Ogden, Jeff wrote:

  
  
  
  

  
Kris
asked: Does
that seem a
workable compromise?

  

  

  
No, not
to me.

  
 

  
This
isn’t a new issue. It is
something that has caused confusion in the past. It was discussed
several times
by the TC and we need to get the clarification included in the spec. 
I’d need
to go back and check, but I’m pretty sure this was something that the
TC voted
on.

  
 

  
    -Jeff