Re: [dita] Terminology issues: Linking and addressing terms?Referencing and referenced element?

From
Joann Hackos <>
Date
2009-12-03T14:28:20+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [dita] Terminology issues: Linking and addressing terms?Referencing and referenced element?
Title: Re: [dita] Terminology issues: Linking and addressing terms? Referencing and referenced element?

The first bulleted list appears to indicate that the items, i.e., conkeyref, are a list of “elements that are referenced”. I would omit the list here and just put in the example with the ID=

Then list the elements only under referencing elements, since these the point at which the operators are actually used. 

Do we need an example of Push?

JoAnn

On 12/3/09 7:20 AM, "Kristen James Eberlein" <> wrote:

That would give us something like the following. Thoughts? What is a non-example?

 Referenced element An element that is referenced by another DITA element (the referencing element). 

@conkeyref attribute 

@conref attribute 

@href attribute 

@keyref attribute

 

 

  Example 

The following code sample is from the installation-reuse.dita topic. The <step> element that it contains is a referenced element; other DITA topics reference the <step> element by using the @conref attribute. 

<step id="run-startcmd-script">

 <cmd>Run the startcmd script that is applicable to your operating-system environment.</cmd>

</step>

 

  Non-example

 

  Referencing element An element which specifies one of the following DITA attributes in order to address another DITA element: 

@conkeyref attribute 

@conref attribute 

@href attribute 

@keyref attribute

 

 

  Example 

The following <step> element is a referencing element. It uses the @conref attribute to reference a <step> element in the installation-reuse.dita topic. 

<step conref="installation-reuse.dita#reuse/run-startcmd-script>

 <cmd/>

</step>

 

  Non-example 

Kris

Joann Hackos wrote: 

 Re: [dita] Terminology issues: Linking and addressing terms? Referencing and referenced element? I really think we need examples here — the definitions are too circular, which isn’t surprising considering the concept is circular. You need three elements to make a concept understandable: a definition, an example, and a non-example. We have the first part, but are missing the example and maybe the non-example.

 

I recommend an example — that would easily clarify the idea we’re trying to convey.

JoAnn

 

 

 

<snipped>