Re: [dita] Terminology issues: Linking and addressing terms? Referencingand referenced element?

Private copy of terminology topic -- sorry, Elliot, but reading that 
makes me cringe. I've now spent 5 or 6 hours working on the terminology 
topic, working review comments and editing.

Please send me your private copy of the terminology topic and I will 
merge the two.

Kris

Eliot Kimber wrote:
> On 12/2/09 8:39 AM, "Kristen James Eberlein" <>
> wrote:
>
>   
>> Thanks, Gershon. I've now edited most of the terms and handled all but five or
>> six of the review topics. (Paul and Jeff, I'll be sending you e-mail ...)
>>
>> However, I noticed that the topic does not contain any of the linking and
>> addressing terminology; I thought we had agreed to move it there.
>>     
>
> That move is part of the linking rework I've been doing--you can see the
> move reflected in my private copy of the terminology topic--I was planning
> to merge that with the main terminology topic once I got to it, which will
> be this evening.
>
> Cheers,
>
> E.
>