RE: [dita] Terminology issues: Grouping of terms

Hi 
Kris,

 

I have 
updated the topic to address most of this thread. The decision was to sort the 
items within each group alphabetically. I have updated some of the group titles 
based on the discussions during the TC meetings you missed. The main thing I 
have not done is to ensure the new terms are correctly used throughout the 
document, and that all old terms are removed or fixed, whichever is 
appropriate.

 

There 
is likely to still be some quibbling over the group titles, but I think I've 
addressed all the issues that were discussed. In some cases no-one came up with 
better titles, so I left the previous one or attempted to improve 
it.

 

--

Gershon

 

From: Kristen James Eberlein 
[mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 
2009 10:25 AM
To: DITA TC
Subject: [dita] Terminology 
issues: Grouping of terms

I am reworking the Terminology topic according to 
the review comments and the following discussion on the TC mailing 
list:

  
results from recent DITA 1.2 terminology discussions 
  
From "Ogden, Jeff" <> on 16 Nov 2009 
  23:40:36 -0000 
  
    
RE: [dita] results from recent DITA 1.2 terminology 
    discussions 
From "Tony Self" <> on 18 
    Nov 2009 10:57:57 -0000 
    
      
Re: [dita] results from recent DITA 1.2 terminology 
      discussions 
From Eliot Kimber <> on 18 
      Nov 2009 11:10:18 -0000 
      
        
vocabulary module [was: results from recent DITA 1.2 
        terminology discussions] 
From "Bruce Nevin 
        (bnevin)" <> on 18 Nov 
        2009 15:30:56 -0000 
        
Re: vocabulary module [was: results from recent DITA 1.2 
        terminologydiscussions] 
From Eliot Kimber <> on 
        18 Nov 2009 15:34:19 -0000 
        
RE: vocabulary module [was: results from recent DITA 1.2 
        terminology discussions] 
From "Bruce Nevin 
        (bnevin)" <> on 18 Nov 
        2009 16:35:54 -0000 
        
Re: vocabulary module [was: results from recent DITA 1.2 
        terminologydiscussions] 
From Eliot Kimber <> on 
        18 Nov 2009 16:38:50 -0000 
        
RE: [dita] Re: vocabulary module [was: results from recent 
        DITA 1.2 terminology discussions] 
From "Bruce 
        Nevin (bnevin)" <> on 18 Nov 
        2009 17:13:17 -0000 

  

Can anyone clarify for me what decision was made about how to group 
the terms? On the first terminology call which I chaired, we decided that 
Gershon would attempt to devise an ordering scheme, but that we would default to 
simply listing the terms in alphabetical order if the group did not come to a 
consensus on how to group the terms.

Was a grouping order agreed upon? Or 
should I simply alphabetize the 
terms?

Kris

--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates 
this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: 
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php