Isn’t having the DTDs be normative an OASIS rule? If so, then our
position may have been clarified for us already.
So is the order of priority: DTDs, XSDs, Language Spec., Arch.
Spec? All with the hope that we don’t actually have any true conflicts.
-Jeff
From: Park Seth-R01164
[mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 1:08 PM
To: dita
Subject: [dita] Normative language specification
I've
been spreading rumors that the DTDs are normative when there is a conflict
between the lang spec and the DTDs.
There
have been some discussions recently that clearly indicate that DTD
technology is insufficient to represent the normative language
specifications.
Can
we clarify our position on this?
-sp
--------------------------------------------
seth
park
information
architect
Freescale
Semiconductor, Inc.
512.895.2463
