On 12/1/09 8:15 AM, "Kristen James Eberlein" <>
wrote:
> I've spent the last couple of hours correcting build errors, looking at the
> draft, and reading through the review comments on the Wiki. It made me aware
> that we have some "holes" that we need to address:
> 1. Do we have an owner for the processing topics? None of the comments on the
> Wiki pages have been addressed. Originally Nancy Harrison was responsible for
> the topics, then responsibility passed to Seth Park. There is work that must
> be done before the next review.
I can take a stab at integrating the comments if there are no other
volunteers.
> 4. What is the status of the reorganization work about keys, linking, and
> addressing? There are unresolved review comments here, also.
I will be working on that over the next couple of days once I have worked
through the comments on the Configuration and extension section.
> 9. For the DITA 1.1 documents, the @collection-type attribute was set to
> "sequence" so that next and previous links were generated in HTML output. What
> was the rationale for doing this, and do we need to repeat this pattern for
> the DITA 1.2 documentation?
As a reader of the HTML I would expect the content to be presented in a
specific sequence and I would expect to be able to conveniently read it
sequentially.
Cheers,
Eliot
--
Eliot Kimber
Senior Solutions Architect
"Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together"
Main: 610.631.6770
www.reallysi.com
www.rsuitecms.com
