for 2:
2. The question
embedded within the following paragraph:
A key is bound to the resource addressed
by the topicref or keyref
in which it is defined, if it is provided.
<!--What happens if none is provided? It can't be resolved? -->
The resource to which a key is bound may
be a DITA map or topic, or it
may be a non-DITA resource such as a graphic
or an object specified
by an external URI.
A key is bound to the resource addressed
by the topicref in which it is defined. If no address is provided, the
key is bound to the information provided by the topicref, such as a title
and metadata.
Michael Priestley, Senior Technical
Staff Member (STSM)
Lead IBM DITA Architect
http://dita.xml.org/blog/25
From:
"Bruce Nevin (bnevin)" <>
To:
"dita" <>
Date:
11/17/2009 12:25 PM
Subject:
[dita] conref.dita editorial review
I have committed
the overview topic titled "Use by reference" to SVN as a revision
of conref.dita.
Four items need
particular attention. They are indicated in XML comments.
1. The question
after the following paragraph:
If the referenced element has a conref attribute specified, the
above rules should be applied recursively with the
resolved element
from one referencing/referenced combination
becoming one of the
two elements participating in the next
referencing/referenced
combination. The result should preserve without generalization
all
elements that are valid in the originating context,
even if they
are not valid in an intermediate context. For example,
if topicA
and topicC allow highlighting, and topicB does not,
then a content
reference chain of topicA>topicB->topicC should
preserve any
highlighting elements in the referenced content. The
result is the
same as if the conref pairs are resolved recursively
starting from
the referencing element.
<!--What do you mean "as if"? There's been no mention
of the
converse. Should this say "the result is the
same whether the
recursive resolution of conref pairs starts from the
referencing
element or from the referenced element"?-->
2. The question
embedded within the following paragraph:
A key is bound to the resource addressed by the topicref
or keyref
in which it is defined, if it is provided.
<!--What happens if none is provided? It can't be resolved?
-->
The resource to which a key is bound may be a DITA
map or topic, or it
may be a non-DITA resource such as a graphic or an
object specified
by an external URI.
3. After the
last of the related-links items, a note that I was unable to make a link
that would take the reader appropriately to the submap because of my uncertainty
about the organization of the content:
<linktext
conref="../common/complexattributedefinitions.dita">Complex
attribute definitions</linktext>
<!--Need to make link to this submap rather than to this stub
topic.-->
4. Should there
be changes to related-links reflecting Eliot's reorganization of linking
and addressing?
