← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
seth's status: Authors, can we meet our 19 October deadline for the 3rd review?
If you asking whether Authors will have all wiki
feedback incorporated into the source by Oct 13, I'm behind because I missed the
'go' signal. I can have that work complete by the 19th for my topics. Moving
content between the archspec and langspec has not been done.
All of my "review" topics are complete, except for the XSD
coding topics in specialization/constraints:
xsdShellDoctypeCodeReq.dita
constraintsDomainDesignPattern-xsd.xml
schemamod.dita
xsdGeneralCodingReq.dita
xsdStructuralSpecializationReqs.dita
xsdAttributeDomainSpecializationCodeReq.dita
-seth
--------------------------------------------
seth park
information architect
Freescale Semiconductor,
Inc.
512.895.2463
From: Kristen James Eberlein
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 9:48
AM
To: JoAnn Hackos; Eliot Kimber; Park Seth-R01164; Robert Anderson;
John Hunt
Cc: DITA TC
Subject: Authors, can we meet our 19
October deadline for the 3rd review?
Authors, below is a table that contains my assessment of the work to
be done before the 3rd review opens. (John Hunt, I haven't added an assessment
for the L & T topics since the subcommittee doesn't expect to be finished
with the review until 13 October.)
Please look over the following table
and get back to me as soon as you can with the following information:
Are the authoring assignments correct? (If so, no need to let me know)
Do you need someone else to take over part of your current assignment?
(Seth, I know you wanted someone else to own a topic or two ...)
Can you meet the 13 October deadline? If not, what deadline could you
meet?
Would having help from someone speed up the progress of the
work?
Elliot and JoAnn, I'd like to volunteer to work on the
"Introduction to DITA" topics if that would be helpful.
Document
Section
Topic collection
Author
Review #2 comments / work to be done
Status
DITA 1.2 specification
Overview of the specification
Eberlein
Moderate
Will be ready for review #3: 19 October 2009
Architectural spec
Introduction to DITA
Hackos
Kimber
Very substantial
Needs discussion to determine how to
handle vocabulary, among other points
DITA markup
DITA topics
Hackos
Moderate
DITA maps
Eberlein
Minimal
Will be ready for review #3: 19 October 2009
DITA addressing and linking
Seth Park
Substantial:
Some (all?) material might need to be relocated to processing
Needs to incorporate mater material about @xref and @keyref that
currently in the Language Reference topics.
DITA metadata
Joseph
No review #2 comments; review #1 comments stated that this
section was weak and needed rethinking
Processing
ID attribute
Park
Substantial
Navigation behaviors
Attribute inheritance
Navigation artifacts.
Content reference
Profiling with select attributes
Chunking
Anderson
Minimal
Printing
Park
Minimal -- do we need a new author for this topic?
Collation
Minimal -- do we need a new author for this topic?
Translation and localization
Hackos
Moderate
The xml:lang attribute
The dir attribute
Element-by-element recommendations for translators
Anderson
Minimal
Specialization
Kimber
Substantial
Configuration and extension
Kimber
Moderate (but has it been adequately reviewed, especially
topics about XSD topics?)
Technical content
Hackos
Moderate
Learning and training
Hunt
Language reference
Base
Anderson
Minimal comments, but needs to implement new
terminology:
Cascading versus inheritance
Referencing and referenced element
Technical content
Anderson?
Learning and training
Hunt
Common attributes
Robert Anderson
Substantial -- some material needs to be relocated in the
arch spec topics
Best,
Kris
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →