It might be something we could tackle
in the automated linking proposal now slated for 1.3. I wouldn't touch
it for 1.2 at this stage.
Michael Priestley, Senior Technical
Staff Member (STSM)
Lead IBM DITA Architect
http://dita.xml.org/blog/25
Don Day <>
09/02/2009 09:36 AM
To
"DITA TC list " <>
cc
Subject
[dita] Under-specification for @refcol?
In dita-users list this week
(http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dita-users/message/15537), Kristen
made
the observation that the DITA 1.1 specification for simpletable's @refcol
attribute gives very little insight into how it should be implemented.
It
appears that the original intent at the time might have anticipated the
"associative linking" thoughts that have since matured as the
keyref
processing specification. Can anyone recall whether we've had previous
discussion for this attribute that needs to be reviewed and added into
the
edits for DITA 1.2?
Regards,
--
Don Day
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Architect, Lightweight DITA Publishing Solutions
Email:
11501 Burnet Rd. MS9033E015, Austin TX 78758
Phone: +1 512-244-2868 (home office)
"Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?"
--T.S. Eliot
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
