Hello Dick,
In the previous releases of DITA if
there was a discrepancy between the DTDs and the XSDs, the DTD was normative.
I think it's stated somewhere in the 1.0 and 1.1 specs. I
don't believe that there are any plans to change that statement for DITA
1.2.
Eric
Eric A. Sirois
Staff Software Developer
DB2 Universal Database - Information Development
DITA XML Schema Architect and DITA Open Toolkit Developer
IBM Canada Ltd. - Toronto Software Lab
Email:
Phone:(905) 413-2841
Blue
Pages (Internal)
"Transparency and accessibility requirements dictate that public information
and government
transactions avoid depending on technologies that imply or impose a specific
product or
platform on businesses or citizens" - EU on XML-based office document
formats.
From:
"Dick Hamilton" <>
To:
"'Dana Spradley'" <>,
<>
Date:
08/05/2009 04:10 PM
Subject:
RE: [dita] FW: [members] Changes to
OASIS TC Process Policy
Dana,
Regarding your message:
>
> Also it appears that we can now consider the DTD we supply
> in separate plain-text files to be normative, and to override
> whatever we actually say in the specification itself.
>
> OTOH, it seems the same can be said about the schema files -
> and it's unclear how discrepancies between the two could be
> handled.
>
Regarding the question of discrepancies between schema and
DTD, I think the right thing to do is to select one to be
normative, and state that other forms are non-normative.
That's what the DocBook committee did. RelaxNG defines the
normative standard, and other representations (W3C Schema,
and DTD) are provided for convenience, but are non-normative.
Regards,
Dick Hamilton
---------------------------------
XML Press
XML for Technical Communicators
http://xmlpress.net
(970) 231-3624
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
