Re: [dita] Arch Spec Review: Review Through "DITA Maps" In the Wiki

I haven't looked at your comments yet, Elliot -- but I agree that much 
(although not all) of the content of markup topics belongs in the 
Language Spec.

Kris

Eliot Kimber wrote:
> I've completed my review through the "DITA Maps" topic and my comments are
> in the Wiki. Most of my comments are intended to make language more precise,
> clarify semantics, or reflect DITA 1.2 aspects not reflected in the original
> language.
>
> It's clear to me from this review that integrating the Language Reference
> with the Arch Spec and moving the detailed markup discussions from what is
> now the Arch Spec to an appropriate area within the Lang Spec would help
> keep the purely architectural stuff from the detailed stuff, which will tend
> to make the architectural discussion clearer and crisper.
>
> Cheers,
>
> E.
>
> ----
> Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc.
> email:   <mailto:>
> office: 610.631.6770 | cell: 512.554.9368
> 2570 Boulevard of the Generals | Suite 213 | Audubon, PA 19403
> www.reallysi.com <http://www.reallysi.com>  | http://blog.reallysi.com
> <http://blog.reallysi.com> | www.rsuitecms.com <http://www.rsuitecms.com> 
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>
>
>
>