Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [dita] proposed packaging and doctype shells for DITA 1.2

From
"Ngden, Keff"
Date
2008-08-19T18:28:15+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [dita] proposed packaging and doctype shells for DITA 1.2
This seems good to me.  We’ll see
what others think.

 

An updated summary of the doctype shells
we expect to include as part of DITA 1.2 is included below.

 

There is also a new Wiki page that lists
the proposed DITA 1.2 doctype shells. See: http://wiki.oasis-open.org/dita/Draft_list_of_doctype_shells_to_be_included_in_DITA_1.2
 

 

Thanks for the quick turn around on this
issue.

 

    -Jeff

 

 

Base Collection:

 
Base Topic 

 
Base Map (map plus Utilities and Map Group domains)
     

 

Technical Content Collection (all topics include hazard, utility, sw, pr, and ui domains):

 
Topic 

 
Concept 

 
Task 

 
General Task 

 
Machine Industry Task
     (the domains from General Task plus the Requirements Domain and without
     the sw and pr domains)

 
Reference 

 
Glossary 

 
Ditabase 

 
Map 

 
Bookmap 

 
Classification map #1
     

 
Classification map #2
     

 

Learning and Training Content Collection:

 
Learning Assessment
     

 
Learning Content 

 
Learning Overview
     

 
Learning Plan 

 
Learning Summary 

 
Learning Topic (Topic plus the
     Learning and Training domains added)
     

 
Learning Map (Base Map plus the
     Learning and Training domains added)
     

 
Learning Bookmap (Bookmap with
     the Learning and Training domains added) 

 

 

From: SeicoDyne DITA
[mailto:] 

Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008
1:35 PM

To: Ogden, Jeff;


Subject: AW: [dita] proposed
packaging and doctype shells for DITA 1.2

 

Jeff

 

we had a pretty long discussion in the
machine industry subcommittee regarding this packaging issue. Unfortuneatly,
all packaging ideas we looked at ideal would break the backward compatibility.
So an optimal solution for that issue - from the machine industry point of view
- will not be possible in DITA 1.x.

 

Finally we decided to
support your proposal.

 

We also discussed the issue needing a
separate machine industry package or not. Finally we decided that it is not yet
required. But for dita 1.3 or dita 2.0 we will bring up a lot of new parts
which will maybe make it necessery to discuss the machine industry package
issue again for dita 1.3 or 2.0.

 

Finally we decided not to
have a separate machine industry package in DITA 1.2.

 

Naming of the task type:

"Task with
requirements domain" is not realy a cool name, and as it is a description
only, I guess it was ment to be renamed. 

As we already have given
the "task requirements domain" a general name indicating that it can
be used in other industries, we finally came to the conclusion that the most
appropriate name for this "General Task with requirements domain" (as
it is build on "General Task"), would be to keep the name for this
task shell as machineryTask.

 

So finally we
decided to propose as name for this topic shell: 

machineryTask,
containing all domains from "generalTask" including "task
requirements domain" but excluding "sw- and pr-domain"

 

Hope that is OK.

 

Best regards

 

 

Chris

 

 

 

SeicoDyne GmbH

Eichenstrasse 16

CH-6015 Reussbühl

Switzerland

Tel: +41 41 534 66 97

Mob: +41 78 790 66 97

Skype:
seicodyne

 

www.seicodyne.com



 

 

 

 

 

Member of the DITA
Technical Committee

Chairman of the
DITA Machine Industry Subcommittee

 

 

Von:
Ogden, Jeff [mailto:] 

Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. August
2008 18:02

An: 

Betreff: RE: [dita] proposed
packaging and doctype shells for DITA 1.2

Here is an update to Michael’s
proposal with clarifications from today’s TC call:

 

Base Collection:

 
Base Topic 

 
Base Map (map plus Utilities and Map Group domains)
     

 

Technical Content Collection (all topics include hazard, utility, sw, pr, and ui domains):

 
Topic 

 
Concept 

 
Task 

 
General Task 

 
Task with requirements domain
     

 
Reference 

 
Glossary 

 
Ditabase 

 
Map 

 
Bookmap 

 
Classification map #1
     

 
Classification map #2
     

 

Learning and Training Content Collection:

 
Learning Assessment
     

 
Learning Content 

 
Learning Overview
     

 
Learning Plan 

 
Learning Summary 

 
Learning Topic (Topic plus the
     Learning and Training domains added)
     

 
Learning Map (Base Map plus the
     Learning and Training domains added)
     

 
Learning Bookmap (Bookmap with
     the Learning and Training domains added) 

 

From: Michael
Priestley [mailto:] 

Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008
11:53 AM

To: 

Subject: [dita] proposed packaging
and doctype shells for DITA 1.2

 

Assumptions: 

- need
to keep the legacy shells from 1.1 to avoid breaking existing users

- beyond
legacy shells, adding only the bare minimum to exercise each new domain and
structural type 

-
users will go to the web tool for most combinations (such as tech content with
learning objectives, or tech content without the sw domain) 

Base
(2 shells): 

 
      topic and map plus utility domains 

Tech
content (11 shells): 

 
      topic, concept, task, general task, task with requirements
domain, reference, glossary, ditabase (all incorp. hazard, utility, sw, pr, ui
domains); 

        bookmap, 2 classification maps 

Learning and training (7 shells): 

 
      5 l&t topic types, topic with l&t domain, map with
l&t domain 

Michael
Priestley

Lead IBM DITA Architect 



http://dita.xml.org/blog/25
Next in thread → Next in month →