Re: [dita] Groups - DITA 1.1 XSDs (dita_xsd_1.1d.zip) uploaded

From
Dana Spradley <>
Date
2006-12-05T17:12:07+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [dita] Groups - DITA 1.1 XSDs (dita_xsd_1.1d.zip) uploaded
Hi Paul,

Yes.  It should be:

<xs:redefine schemaLocation="mapGrp.xsd">
        <xs:group name="topicref">
            <xs:choice>
                <xs:group ref="topicref"/>
                <xs:group ref="mapgroup-d-topicref"/>
            </xs:choice>
        </xs:group>
  </xs:redefine>

Eric
Eric A. Sirois
Staff Software Developer
DB2 Universal Database - Information Development
DITA Migration and Tools Development
IBM Canada Ltd. - Toronto Software Lab
Email: 
Blue Pages (Internal)

"Transparency and accessibility requirements dictate that public
information and government
transactions avoid depending on technologies that imply or impose a
specific product or
platform on businesses or citizens" - EU on XML-based office document
formats.


                                                                           
             "Grosso, Paul"                                                
             <>                                             
                                                                        To 
             12/01/2006 10:19          Eric Sirois/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA       
             AM                                                         cc 
                                       <>         
                                                                   Subject 
                                       RE: [dita] Groups - DITA 1.1 XSDs   
                                       (dita_xsd_1.1d.zip) uploaded        
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




In your comment, I don't see any different in the redefine.

Should the "To:" have xs:choice instead of xs:sequence?

paul